So to the left you're looking at a very basic position vs time graph. The topic of comparing position, distance, and displacement came up. So in this example, At 5 seconds:
Position: 50 m
Distance: 50 m
Displacement: 50 m
All of these came out to be the same in this scenario, BUT THIS IS NOT ALWAYS THE CASE!!!!!
So before I dive in deeper, I think it's a good idea to define the terms I've used so far.
Position- Position is the location the object is at. So in the graph above, at 5 seconds the position is at 50m.
Displacement- Displacement is how far the object is relative to the reference point. Direction matters!
Distance- Distance is the amount traveled in total regardless of direction.
So here's a question: What's a scenario where position, displacement, and distance are all different?
So basically here's an answer. Obviously this isn't the only answer but the general idea applies. Basically to answer this, your starting point and reference point need to differ and at one point you need at least one positive and negative slope on your graph.
So in this graph specifically, the intervals on the y-axis go up by 20, and the x intervals increase by 1.
I will evaluate the graph at 6 seconds.
Position: 20 m
Displacement: 0 m
Distance: 80 m
Also, since we already have a graph above, we might as well knock two birds out at once and talk about velocity and speed as well.
Velocity: displacement/time
Speed: distance/time
So for the example above
Average velocity: 0/6 = 0 m/s/s
Average speed: 80/6 = 13.3 m/s
Just to tie in acceleration a little, basically the slope of a position vs time graph equals velocity, and then the from the slope of a velocity graph you can get acceleration.
So basically, this is what helped me the most. If it's still confusing after this, I recommend watching youtube videos that can clearly explain it in a few minutes with examples and whatnot.
We also did a lab which was pretty fun. So basically we were given a boiling flask that was 500 ml, which looked like this:
So basically we measured, and in our flask only the bottom circular portion was 500 ml, and the neck was 50 ml. So our task was to basically record the height at a certain amount of time. So what we did was we did a scale that 1 sec = 1 ml. And since there was 550 ml, theoretically, 25 ml with 22 trials should fill up the entire flask. So basically, we would put in 25 ml of water, which would also represent 25 seconds, and then we would measure the height of the water with the ruler. We ended up having to do 24 cups of 25 ml, due to imprecise measuring (we literally used like 8 different beakers and graduated cylinders because of the time crunch) but this was pretty insignificant because it did not effect what were analyzing. Basically, when the flask is thinner the slope of the position vs time graph would be steeper, and then at the wider parts it would be less steep. What was really cool about this experiment, was that if you turned the flask sideways that's what the velocity vs time graph would look like. I just thought that was really cool and worth sharing about.
This was really a great effort! Did you actually make those graphs?!?! So good. What an improvement from freshman year! I really like the enthusiasm you are bringing to class this year. Keep up the great work!
ReplyDelete